Teacher World

Just a quick update tonight on the Tyler Clementi case as it pertains to Dharun Ravi, Tyler’s former roommate at Rutgers University.

I’m sure you all remember reading and hearing about the tragic suicide of Tyler Clementi this past September shortly after his roommate, Dharun Ravi, and Molly Wei, allegedly videoed a romantic encounter Tyler had with another man in his dorm room and streamed it online for others to see.

I have reported already in a previous blog, that Molly Wei appeared in court earlier this month where she pled not guilty in two counts of invasion of privacy for watching the video with Ravi. Per court orders, Wei must complete a three-year counseling program on cyber bullying as well as alternate and cultural lifestyles. She must also complete 300 hours of community service.  Included in her plea deal was her agreement to testify against Ravi. If she completes the counseling and community service without further legal problems, the invasion of privacy charges will be dropped from her record.

So, that leaves us with Dharun Ravi whose attorneys entered a not guilty plea today on behalf of their client. No surprise there, right? He is charged with streaming the video of this physical relationship which, according to prosecutors, was allegedly accessed from another room and then advertised on Twitter, making this private encounter, without Tyler’s knowledge, publicly available to others.

Ravi is facing a 15-count indictment of hate crime charges involving invasion of privacy and evidence tampering. Prosecutors claim that after the incident (I’m sure when Ravi realized what kind of trouble he was in) he tried to cover up his actions by deleting a previous Twitter post, replacing it with one he hoped would mislead investigators. Additionally, prosecutors claim that he asked witnesses not to testify against him.

The tragic suicide of Tyler Clementi has sparked grave concern for young people like Tyler who face bullying on school campuses leading to an increase in anti-bullying sentiment all across our nation. It sparked President Obama less than a month after his death to condemn what had transpired at Rutgers University and to say to others like Tyler, “You are not alone. You did not do anything wrong. You didn’t do anything to deserve being bullied and there is a whole world waiting for you filled with possibilities.”

And it prompted the proposed federal anti-harassment legislation called the “Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act.” If this law is passed, it would require any school that receives federal student aid to develop policies which would prohibit the harassment of any student on a school campus.

In the meantime, I will continue to update you regarding Dharun Ravi’s case. I can only hope the courts remember the family of Tyler Clementi before agreeing to any deals which keep Ravi from facing up to the consequences of his misguided and bigoted actions. A slap on the wrist this time would be criminal! 

.

Bullying, Teacher-World's Blog cyber bullying, Dharun Ravi, invasion of privacy, Molly Wei, Tyler Clementi

Is it me, or is the month of May turning into bullying-plea-bargain season? Just when I think I’ve covered every plea bargain out there, here’s one more, this time from Trenton, New Jersey.

You remember the case from Rutgers University involving the video taping of Tyler Clementi in an encounter with another boy by his roommate, Dharun Ravi who was aided by Molly Wei. The video was posted online for others to see leading to Tyler’s apparent suicidal jump off the George Washington Bridge.

This past Friday, Molly Wei pleaded not guilty to two counts of invasion of privacy. The deal she accepted requires she be admitted into a three-year pretrial intervention program. If she completes that program without additional legal troubles, the two invasion of privacy charges, which she received for allegedly watching the video with Tyler, will be dropped, according to a statement from the Middlesex County Prosecutor’s Office.

But, that’s not all! Wei will also have to complete 300 hours of community service, participate in counseling which centers on cyber bullying and alternate and cultural lifestyles, and (and this is a biggie) she must testify against Ravi.

According to authorities, Ravi was the one who placed the camera in the room without Tyler’s knowledge and accessed it remotely. Then, according to Middlesex County Prosecutor Bruce J. Kaplan, he “provided others an opportunity to view the encounter.”

As if this wasn’t bad enough, Ravi tried to view a second encounter between Tyler and the same male two days later. He then alerted others on Twitter of the planned meeting. Then, according to the statement, he deleted the tweet, replacing it with a false one in order to mislead investigators.

Ravi has been indicted by a grand jury on 15 counts which include invasion of privacy, bias intimidation, tampering with physical evidence, witness tampering, and hindering apprehension of prosecution. He is to be arraigned on May 23.

Wei remained silent after the brief hearing, but her lawyer claimed that she isn’t a bully and has been cooperative with both the investigation and the prosecutor’s office.

In the meantime, Tyler’s father, Joe, read a statement outside the courtroom in which he said that the charges were a direct result of Wei’s “bad decisions without regard for another person’s privacy or dignity. … We are here to say that we are committed to do what we can to reinforce calls for compassion and respect for human dignity that have been made in response to Tyler’s experience…”

“Actions have consequences,” he concluded. “We hope Ms. Wei will become a better person and show kindness to people.”

I reported earlier today regarding the plea agreements in the Phoebe Prince case. As I compare these two situations, I must applaud the judge of this West Windsor, New Jersey court, and anyone else who helped draft this agreement, for a job well-done. This, as far as I am concerned, is a much more appropriate plea agreement; one that better fits the crime.

The extended length of time, three years rather than just one or less than one year, seems fairer. And I think it is awesome that during this time she will do 300 not just 100 hours of community service. This service will take time, it will be inconvenient, and it will be a constant reminder to her of what she did and what she must never do again.

And why wasn’t counseling a criteria in the Prince pleas? How appropriate that Wei will be a captive audience as she explores the difference between insensitivity and compassion for people who face cyber bullying or who live an alternative lifestyle.

Molly has been offered the chance of a lifetime; the chance to learn from her mistakes, to be a better, more sensitive person who accepts others even when they are different from her.

This agreement lends itself to true restitution and rehabilitation. I commend this court for coming up with a set of firm, yet fair, requirements which, if followed, will strengthen this girl’s spirit rather than crush it.

Good luck to you, Molly Wei. Use this time wisely, for your sake and for Tyler’s.

Bullying, Teacher-World's Blog Bullying, cyber bullying, Dharun Ravi, Molly Wei, plea bargains, teen suicide, Tyler Clementi

Seven months after Tyler Clementi allegedly committed suicide after his roommate, Dharun Ravi, and fellow student, Molly Wei, taped and posted on the Internet his sexual encounter with another student, there is finally some news regarding Ravi’s possible fate.

Dharun Ravi, a 19-year old former Rutgers University freshman, was indicted this past Wednesday in Middlesex County on 15 counts, which include bias intimidation and invasion of privacy in regard to the events which preceded Tyler Clementi’s suicide on September 22 of last year. Ravi and Wei had already faced invasion of privacy charges but it took months for prosecutors to present their case to a grand jury. Their case alleges that Ravi targeted his roommate due to his sexual orientation and posted the encounter online on September 19 in order to intimidate him.

A statement from county prosecutors read, “Under state law, bias is charged a degree higher than the underlying crime, in this case, invasion of privacy. The defendant has also been charged with two counts of second-degree bias and two counts of third-degree bias. A second-degree offense carries a prison exposure of five to 10 years.”

Ravi was additionally charged with three counts of tampering with evidence, three counts of hindering his own apprehension, and a single count of witness tampering. Prosecutor Bruce Kaplan said that the grand jurors determined that Ravi attempted to mislead investigators and witnesses in a variety of ways. They determined that Ravi deleted a post on Twitter alerting students to watch Clementi’s encounter with another man online.

“The grand jury indictment spells out cold and calculated acts against our son Tyler by his former college roommate. We are eager to have the process move forward for justice in this case and to reinforce the standards of acceptable conduct in our society,” said Joseph and Jane Clementi, in a statement issued by their attorney.

In the United States, grand juries meet privately and issue indictments if probable cause exists, but criminal trial juries must then find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in order to convict.

Meanwhile, Molly Wei’s case has not been presented to the grand jury at this time. It was uncertain on Wednesday, whether her case would go before the grand jury or whether she had helped prosecutors in an effort to lessen her sentence.

Bullying, Teacher-World's Blog Bullying, Dharun Ravi, grand jury indictments, Molly Wei, Rutgers University, teen suicide, Tyler Clementi

My first follow-up of the Tyler Clementi blog posted this weekend deals with the two young people whose poor judgment and malicious bullying were indirectly responsible for this young man’s apparent suicide. If you recall, Dharun Ravi, Tyler’s roommate, was allegedly responsible for using the webcam on his computer to tape a private moment Tyler had with a man. Then, he and Molly Wei allegedly streamed this intimate video on the Internet for other students to see. So what has happened to these two Rutgers students and how have their precipitous actions affected their lives? That is the subject of this blog.

First, Dharun Ravi and Molly Wei, both residents of New Jersey, have each been charged with two counts of invasion of privacy for using a camera to view and then transmit live images of Tyler during this intimate encounter. They face the possibility of up to five years in prison which is the maximum sentence if found guilty. Additionally, Dharun faces two more counts of invasion of privacy for trying to send a similar live feed on the Internet the day before Tyler’s suicide on September 21.

The investigation is ongoing and could possibly involve additional charges. Some people are going so far is to call the death of Tyler Clementi a result of a hate crime. Steven Goldstein, chairman of Garden State Equality, a gay rights group, made the following statement about Ravi and Wei’s actions: “We are sickened that anyone in our society, such as the students allegedly responsible for making the surreptitious video, might consider destroying others’ lives as a sport,”

Molly Wei was released on her own recognizance, and Dharun Ravi was freed on bail. And what has happened to their lives since then? Apparently they both faced some major repercussions for their actions, to the extent that they were “shunned and vilified”. They also faced disciplinary action if they had stayed at Rutgers. Therefore, Ravi transferred to another school, and according to Molly’s lawyer, she quit out of fear for her own life. She is studying to take her SAT’s again in order to go back to school at some future time.

Now, here is the sad truth. These two people made a terrible decision meant to humiliate and publicly destroy another person. No one with an ounce of decency would treat another human being in such a devastatingly hateful manner. Whether this was a hate crime or not, it has certainly been about hate. Either they hated Tyler, hated what he was doing, or have no respect for other people’s privacy as long as they get a laugh. Are they really surprised that they are being “shunned and vilified”? Hate tends to beget hate. That old adage comes to mind that you reap what you sow. I surmise that it isn’t so funny to them now, and I would hazard a guess that if given the same opportunity now, their actions would be very different.

So, two more lives have forever been altered due to this tragic incident. The difference is that Tyler’s life is over, but Ravi and Wei’s futures still hang in the balance. I can only hope that they use this tragedy to grow, to take responsibility for their actions, and to learn from their terrible mistakes. Moving on, even if they do not go to prison, will not be easy for these two.

May this tragic event and it’s equally tragic repercussions send a strong message to our young people to stop using the Internet to bully and harass others.

Bullying, Teacher-World's Blog cyber bullying, Dharun Ravi, harassment, Molly Wei, Tyler Clementi

I’m sure you all remember September’s sad news reports about Tyler Clementi, his roommate’s betrayal, and Tyler’s resultant suicide. Such a terrible loss in and of itself, but apparently, a rash of teenage suicides are being linked to this case, so I am going to revisit Tyler’s sad story in this blog and will talk about the national ramifications of his suicide in a future one.

What happened to Tyler is one of the most brutal forms of high-tech bullying I have ever heard about. On September 19, Tyler Clementi, a quiet, shy Rutgers University student with a love for and a talent for violin, was videoed by his roommate in the privacy of Tyler’s room as he engaged in an intimate moment with another male. Allegedly, Dharun Ravi, Tyler’s roommate, used a webcam on his computer to make the video and then posted a message on his Twitter account telling his friends what he had seen. Although Ravi and Molly Wei, another student accused of involvement in Tyler’s harassment, claim they only watched the video for a few minutes in private, they are being accused of streaming the video on the internet for their friends to view as well. Ravi is also being accused of trying a similar live feed on the Internet on September 21, the day before the suicide.

Whatever the extent of the cyber bullying, the effect was tragic as only three days after the original internet posting, Clementi wrote the following note on his Facebook page: “Jumping off the gw bridge sorry.” And that is exactly what he did! On September 22, Tyler Clementi jumped from the George Washington Bridge into the Hudson River in an apparent suicide. A life lost due to on-line bullying by two misguided teenagers who decided that they had the right to tell the world something Tyler wasn’t ready for the world to know in the most humiliating way possible. How sad that these young people felt the need to judge someone who had never hurt them out of some misguided sense of power! And three lives have been forever altered due to ignorance and intolerance.

But it doesn’t end here. And that is the topic of a future blog…

Bullying, Teacher-World's Blog cyber bullying, Dharun Ravi, Molly Wei, Rutgers University, Tyler Clementi